No Products in the Cart
Recently, e-cigarettes have become the focus of public opinion.On March 18, India's finance minister announced that India would ban the production, import, export, sale and advertising of whistling water pipes.The ban has been approved by the Indian cabinet and will be formally enacted in the form of an executive order soon.
To justify the ban, the government cited several reasons. In addition to health concerns and the prevention of drug abuse among minors, it invoked article 47 of the constitution of India, which protects the general interests of public health.
But is it really so?
All the sisi in the world are for profit;The noise of the world is all about profit.No policy can be made without a game of interest groups behind it.On September 27, after smoking, electronic cigarette importers PlumeVapour and another electronic cigarette company WokeVapors filed a lawsuit to kolkata's high court.""The government's ban is suspected to be unconstitutional, arbitrary and excessive," said Abishek Manu Singway, a lawyer for the prosecution.
Coincidentally, JuulLabs, the largest U.S. e-cigarette giant, plans to enter the Indian market by the end of 2019 and has hired several executives in recent months.The move comes at a time when the Indian government's policy to ban the sale of e-cigarettes is a major setback for JuulLabs, which is preparing to expand its presence in India.Although article 47 of the Indian constitution obliges the government to protect the public health interests of its citizens, is the ban based solely on national health?The real purpose behind it is worth exploring further.
Who is the biggest beneficiary of the ban?It can be said that the ban fulfills the state's obligation under article 47 of the Indian constitution and guarantees citizens' right to health.But capital is honest.Shares in ITC, an Indian company, rose 2 per cent on the second day of the ban.
Who is the ITC?Formerly known as India tobacco, the ITC is based in the litigation center of kolkata.The company sells 86.7 billionwater pipes online a year, or 80 percent of the Indian market, and is the country's largest cigarette seller.The Indian government owns 32 per cent of ITC.It is impossible to know if the government's ban is consistent with what cigarette makers think, or if it has been planned for a long time.
Tax administration is another consideration for the government.There is no denying that tobacco is an important source of tax revenue for all countries. The impact of e-cigarettes on tax revenue cannot be ignored, and India is no exception.In India, the tobacco industry is taxed at the same rate as luxury goods, at 28%.E-cigarettes, on the other hand, are not affected by the tax, which applies at a much lower consumption tax rate.
In or out?
For a while, the global expansion of e-cigarettes was held back by interest groups that banned the sale of e-cigarettes in the United States, India, Japan, Thailand, Brazil and other countries.However, it is worth noting that e-cigarettes, as an alternative to traditional tobacco, have healthier and environmentally sound properties, which can give smokers a transition period and help reduce the quit response.It also has an appropriate protective effect on the people around smokers to prevent them from becoming victims of second-hand smoke.
While there is occasional negative coverage of e-cigarettes in the news, the case behind this is that few manufacturers are lax in their quality control, allowing interest groups to make a big deal out of e-cigarettes, and governments to ban them out of their own self-interest."The ban also killed many tightly controlled, cheap and popular e-cigarettes.Is this yet another abuse of executive power?"The fundamental property rights granted to business operators by the constitution are violated, and government actions may be suspected of being unconstitutional.
As a result of the trucking dispute, technological change is inexorable, and healthy glass pipes amazon, suitable for young people, are poised to take a bigger share of the market.The growth and maturity of an industry cannot be separated from compliance issues and the understanding and application of relevant laws.
China's e-cigarette companies have been out of the country for years, and in the process have faced big and small legal problems.As noted at the beginning of the article, Indian lawyers representing e-cigarette companies are suing the kolkata government, and randy's firm has been tapping into the legal market in many developing countries, including south and southeast Asia, for years.Randy's e-cigarette industry legal services team aims to provide one-stop legal, fiscal and tax services for e-cigarette enterprises in China, so as to ensure the development of relevant industries and maritime enterprises.